
Australia has no shortage of talent. We have world-class founders, sophisticated investors, leading universities, and a growing pool of private capital looking for opportunities. Yet despite these advantages, Australia continues to struggle with a persistent challenge: turning innovation into sustained economic growth. The missing ingredient is not capital. It is liquidity.
Liquidity is the ability to move capital in and out of investments efficiently, at a fair price, when it is needed. It is what transforms paper value into deployable capital. It gives investors the confidence to commit funds, founders the confidence to build for the long term, and employees the confidence that their equity has real value. Without it, capital becomes trapped.
Across Australia’s innovation ecosystem, this problem is already visible. Founders are often paper-rich but cash-poor. Employees hold equity they cannot readily value or access. Investors face uncertain exit pathways. Capital that could be funding the next generation of businesses instead sits idle. For all the attention given to productivity, innovation, and private capital mobilisation, liquidity remains the overlooked foundation that enables all three.
Why Liquidity Matters
The relationship between liquidity and innovation is straightforward. When investors can see a credible pathway to realise value, they are more willing to invest earlier and more aggressively. Venture capital flows more freely, growth capital becomes more available, and debt providers gain confidence in valuations and collateral. In other words, liquidity at the exit drives capital at the entry.
The benefits extend further. Liquid markets reduce the premium investors demand for being locked into an investment. Lower liquidity risk translates into a lower cost of capital, allowing businesses to invest, hire, and expand more efficiently. This is not simply a financial markets issue; it is a productivity issue. Every economy seeking to accelerate innovation must solve the challenge of capital formation, and every successful capital formation system is built on liquidity.
What Australia Can Learn From Global Markets
Around the world, leading markets have recognised that liquidity does not happen by accident. It must be deliberately engineered.
South Korea has built one of the most sophisticated tiered exchange structures in the world. The progression from KONEX for early-stage businesses, to KOSDAQ for growth companies, and ultimately to KOSPI for larger enterprises creates a visible and liquid pathway through a company’s lifecycle. Supported by extensive market-making programs, the Korean system provides investors with confidence that liquidity will be available as businesses mature and scale. For founders and venture investors alike, that visibility matters.
India has taken a proactive approach to supporting smaller and emerging companies. Under the SME listing frameworks of NSE Emerge and BSE SME, companies are required to have designated market makers providing continuous two-way pricing for a minimum period after listing. Rather than hoping liquidity develops organically, the system creates incentives and obligations that support active trading from day one. The result is a more credible pathway for founders, investors, and growth-stage businesses seeking access to public markets.
Japan offers perhaps the clearest demonstration of what liquidity reform can achieve. For decades, large portions of corporate Japan were effectively locked up through cross-shareholdings and inefficient capital structures. In recent years, the Tokyo Stock Exchange implemented significant reforms, including new liquidity requirements, revised definitions of tradable shares, and greater pressure on boards to improve capital efficiency. The outcome has been substantial: cross-shareholdings have been unwound, capital has been recycled back into markets, buybacks have reached record levels, and investor participation has strengthened. Liquidity reform did not simply improve market activity; it helped unlock dormant capital across the economy.
Australia’s Liquidity Challenge
Australia’s challenge is that many aspects of our market structure remain illiquid by design. The ASX is highly concentrated, market-making frameworks are limited, securities lending and options markets remain relatively shallow compared with global peers, and private secondary markets are still developing.
The consequences are visible throughout the innovation ecosystem. Founders often struggle to access value from their shareholdings without pursuing a full exit. Employees may hold meaningful equity but have limited opportunities to realise its value. Venture investors face uncertainty around liquidity events. Growth companies remain private for longer, while public market participation continues to decline. At a time when Australia is searching for ways to boost productivity and economic dynamism, these structural barriers deserve greater attention.
Liquidity Without Selling
Public market reform is essential, but meaningful structural change takes time. The immediate challenge is how founders, employees and shareholders can access liquidity today without sacrificing long-term ownership.
This is where private liquidity solutions become increasingly important. The traditional approach has been binary: either hold an illiquid asset indefinitely or sell shares outright. A growing number of founders and shareholders are looking for alternatives that allow them to access cash while remaining aligned with the long-term value of the companies they helped build.
Solutions such as lending against private share holdings allow individuals to unlock liquidity while retaining ownership and future upside. Rather than forcing premature exits, these structures provide access to capital while preserving long-term alignment between founders, employees, investors, and the businesses they are building.
This is not a substitute for deeper public markets. It is a complementary solution. Healthy innovation ecosystems require both robust public market liquidity and effective private market liquidity solutions. Together, they create a continuum that supports businesses from startup through to maturity.
The Opportunity Ahead
Australia does not need to solve a talent problem, nor does it need to solve a capital problem. What it needs is a liquidity solution.
If we want more investment in innovation, more productive businesses, and more globally competitive companies, we must focus on the mechanisms that allow capital to circulate efficiently throughout the economy. Liquidity is not a by-product of success; it is one of the conditions that makes success possible.